TRAC:

Last week, the University issued a reminder to academic staff to complete the Time-Allocation Survey. This survey is designed to generate the data that the University is legally obliged to submit as part of an annual Transparent Approach to Costing (TRAC) return. This is a requirement for all UK Higher Education Institutions to be eligible to receive grant funding from Funding Councils.

For submission to be valid, the surveys need to reach a sufficient response rate (about 50% in large schools, and 75% in small schools) and our University is currently missing these response rates by some margin.  While we recognise that academic staff are overwhelmed by current workloads, we are also aware that financial penalties from failing to submit TRAC data will hurt us all at Cardiff University. Cardiff UCU is therefore asking academic members, if possible, to try and complete the time allocation survey before the deadline of 30 September 2020.

Last week, the University issued a reminder to academic staff to complete the Time-Allocation Survey. This survey is designed to generate the data that the University is legally obliged to submit as part of an annual Transparent Approach to Costing (TRAC) return. This is a requirement for all UK Higher Education Institutions to be eligible to receive grant funding from Funding Councils.

For submission to be valid, the surveys need to reach a sufficient response rate (about 50% in large schools, and 75% in small schools) and our University is currently missing these response rates by some margin.  While we recognise that academic staff are overwhelmed by current workloads, we are also aware that financial penalties from failing to submit TRAC data will hurt us all at Cardiff University. Cardiff UCU is therefore asking academic members, if possible, to try and complete the time allocation survey before the deadline of 30 September 2020.

Survey on LGBT+ experiences of structures, functions and lived realities of working life in higher education institutions:

UCU is running a survey in collaboration with colleagues in Kent and at Sussex on LGBT+ experiences in HE.

The aim of this survey is to provide a listening space for LGBT+ voices covering a wide range of areas within higher education institutions in the UK to address concerns about marginalised or excluded LGBT+ people, perspectives, teaching and research in higher education institutions.
UCU research and policy demonstrates considerable reason for concern about the position LGBT+ workers find themselves in within higher education institutions. Pride and Prejudice in Education (2016) reported that whilst many organisations had policies that included LGBT+  inclusivity these were not implemented effectively.

Members who identify as part of the LGBT+ community are encouraged to participate in the survey by following the link or by using the QR code.

The survey closes on the 12th of October.

1. Update on negotiations:

The three campus unions (Unite, UNISON and UCU) are pleased to announce that the projected deficit has reduced and the university are saying that they will fund the current projected deficit from reserves.  The proposed changes to terms and conditions are no longer being pursued by the university at this point in time.  As Unions our members’ collective will to push back on the proposals until there were more facts has been clearly vindicated.  Had we not done this members could have been in a worse position financially.  We will of course keep you updated as the financial situation develops.

This is the very positive result received at the last Joint Consultative and Negotiating Forum (JCNF) following our continued resistance to the University’s proposals to make staff cuts. Our negotiators were put under considerable pressure by senior management to agree to staff cuts and our strong position has paid off.

We also made progress on workloads, with management agreeing to hold a joint union partnership forum to properly address our serious workload problems. This is a positive step and our negotiators will continue to hold management to their commitment to engage in “open and honest” discussions.

Our negotiators have very firmly and consistently communicated our members’ health and safety concerns to UEB but these have not been resolved. These are more fully addressed in this Health, Safety and Wellbeing document, but our key concerns remain:

  • that meaningful consultation, a legal obligation of our employer, has not taken place across the board and we cannot give our members assurances about the safety of the workplace.
  • that staff will be forced to work on campus without enough consideration of their personal circumstances.
  • that the concerns of those whose health and wellbeing is at risk as a result of working from home have not been properly addressed.
  • that wellbeing issues emerging as a result of increasing workloads have not been addressed.

TRAC:

Last week, the University issued a reminder to academic staff to complete the Time-Allocation Survey. This survey is designed to generate the data that the University is legally obliged to submit as part of an annual Transparent Approach to Costing (TRAC) return. This is a requirement for all UK Higher Education Institutions to be eligible to receive grant funding from Funding Councils.

For submission to be valid, the surveys need to reach a sufficient response rate (about 50% in large schools, and 75% in small schools) and our University is currently missing these response rates by some margin.  While we recognise that academic staff are overwhelmed by current workloads, we are also aware that financial penalties from failing to submit TRAC data will hurt us all at Cardiff University. Cardiff UCU is therefore asking academic members, if possible, to try and complete the time allocation survey before the deadline of 30 September 2020.

Last week, the University issued a reminder to academic staff to complete the Time-Allocation Survey. This survey is designed to generate the data that the University is legally obliged to submit as part of an annual Transparent Approach to Costing (TRAC) return. This is a requirement for all UK Higher Education Institutions to be eligible to receive grant funding from Funding Councils.

For submission to be valid, the surveys need to reach a sufficient response rate (about 50% in large schools, and 75% in small schools) and our University is currently missing these response rates by some margin.  While we recognise that academic staff are overwhelmed by current workloads, we are also aware that financial penalties from failing to submit TRAC data will hurt us all at Cardiff University. Cardiff UCU is therefore asking academic members, if possible, to try and complete the time allocation survey before the deadline of 30 September 2020.

Survey on LGBT+ experiences of structures, functions and lived realities of working life in higher education institutions:

UCU is running a survey in collaboration with colleagues in Kent and at Sussex on LGBT+ experiences in HE.

The aim of this survey is to provide a listening space for LGBT+ voices covering a wide range of areas within higher education institutions in the UK to address concerns about marginalised or excluded LGBT+ people, perspectives, teaching and research in higher education institutions.
UCU research and policy demonstrates considerable reason for concern about the position LGBT+ workers find themselves in within higher education institutions. Pride and Prejudice in Education (2016) reported that whilst many organisations had policies that included LGBT+  inclusivity these were not implemented effectively.

Members who identify as part of the LGBT+ community are encouraged to participate in the survey by following the link or by using the QR code.

The survey closes on the 12th of October.

Return to campus – Risk Assessments and how to raise concerns:

Cardiff University as our employer owes us a duty of care. To challenge them when they are failing to take the necessary steps to protect our health and safety, we need to collect evidence. This is a precursor to taking any form of legal action. We also need to comply with the University’s own procedures. Should legal action follow, the legal authorities will expect individuals to have fully exhausted these procedures.

On that basis should you be asked to return to work, your employer will be required to perform a risk assessment. However, their assessment of the circumstances may differ from yours. So the first step is to perform your own assessment of your working environment. If your assessment differs from the employers in that you have concerns regarding your health and safety, you should bring it to the attention of the appropriate person. In most cases this will be your line manager, but there may be instances where management have appointed a safety officer.

It is helpful if you use the forms provided by the University.  The University also requires you to complete the All Wales Risk Assessment. Arbitration bodies will look kindly if you have used the employer’s procedures.  It shows you are willing to support the employer, by following their guidance.   It also focuses the matter on the dispute in hand, rather than obfuscating procedural matters.

You can find relevant forms here.

  • HSE Health and Safety Poster (which should be displayed in a prominent visible place)
  • Risk Assessment forms
  • Workplace Inspection forms

 

Your line manager may have already completed a workplace inspection form.  There is usually a nominated person, within an office, to complete this for efficiency.  It would be quite acceptable to ask if this has been done, and could you have sight of the document to ascertain if your concerns have been highlighted, and what priority has been assigned to them.  If you are not given sight of the document, do not assume it has been done, it probably hasn’t been done well, if at all.  Your line manager is busy “spinning plates” too.

If you have to email your line manager, please use the following wording.  If we all use the same or similar wording then this reduces the risk of individuals being isolated.  Senior management will identify it as a collective action and will wish to identify the organisers, which is the union, and that is where they will focus their efforts.
Proposed wording: 

‘I am very concerned about the suggestion that I return to on-site work activities without knowing all suitable and sufficient risk management controls are in place making it safe to return. My union, UCU, will be advising me of the outcome of collective consultations over any proposed risk management strategy Cardiff University may have. I therefore request that this consultation takes place with UCU prior to any consultation with me individually

If, despite my concerns, you insist I return to work please find a Risk Assessment/Workplace Inspection Form, highlighting my concerns and suggestions on actions required to enable me to conduct my work without significant risks to my Health and Safety.

I would appreciate a response prior to my return to campus, so that I can take responsibility and appropriate steps for my own safety as required’

Solidarity with USW – A Message from UNISON:

The University of South Wales (USW) has announced plans to employ all new support staff in a new company owned by the University which will allow them to employ staff on lower wages, inferior pensions, and reduced terms and conditions. This is being done in the name of cutting costs despite the University sitting on cash reserves of £100 million pounds. In most cases, new starters will earn thousands of pounds less than existing colleagues doing exactly the same job. The proposed terms are the worst of any University in the UK. New starters will effectively be second-class employees.

New support staff will get:
+ Lower Wages

+ Far Inferior Pension
+ Less Maternity/Paternity pay
+ Less Annual Leave
+ Less Sick leave
+ No Flexitime
+ Performance Related Pay
+ No Cost of Living Increase (unless directors say otherwise)

These changes will affect staff working in IT, examinations, academic registry, libraries, estates, accommodation and student support. Academic staff will not be affected, which sends a clear signal that support staff are not important to the University Executive.

The University is sitting on cash reserves of £100 million pounds. The University takes its staff from communities with high levels of deprivation. By doing this the University will be taking money away from a poorer area and failing in its civic duty. Female employees will also be disproportionately affected as they comprise the majority of support staff. Existing staff could eventually be transferred to the new company and its inferior employment contracts.

 

If this is able to go through at USW it will soon come knocking on the doors of other Universities!

Staff unions, GMB and UNISON, are appalled by this divisive strategy and supported by the university lecturers’ union, UCU, we are determined to challenge and oppose these plans. We will be enlisting the support of students, the local community and politicians to resist these proposals.

Show your support, please sign and share their petition today!

Thank you

UNISON Branch Secretary